
Last Modified 05-12-2008 18.01
News Tags
Related Bianet News
News
Two Turkish judges successively impose categorical ban on access to Youtube.com, for the content of one single video clip.
Bıa news centre - Ankara, Sivas
23-01-2008
Access to the video-sharing site Youtube was banned with a court decision from the Ankara 12th Magistrate Criminal Court. When the ban was lifted, the Sivas 2nd Magistrate Criminal Court banned access again.
Anyone trying to access the site is met with the message, “Access to this site has been suspended in accordance with decision No 2008/11 of 16.01.2008.”
On 17 January, the Ankara 12th Criminal Court of Peace decided on the ban because the content of one video “contained disrespect towards Atatürk and Turkishness.”
International freedom of press and expression organisations have condemned the fact that access to a whole website has been suspended because of one video.
A similar problem was experienced in March last year because of a video said to contain an insult towards Atatürk. The Paris-based Reporters Without Borders (RSF), pointing to similar implementations in Brazil and Iran, had called the complete ban on access “a radical and disproportionate precaution” against “ a few documents of an offensive nature.”
Meanwhile, Internet users trying to access the Wordpress.com site since August 2007 have been met by the message “Access to this site has been suspended in accordance with decision no: 2007/195 of T.C. Fatih 2.Civil Court of First Instance” (EÖ/TK/AG)
|
Home Page |
Documents | About Us |
Links
| Çocuk Sitesi | BİAMag |
Kadının Penceresi | News in English
This website is published within the framework of "Journalism for Rights, Rights for Journalists" -dubbed as BİA3 - project implemented by the IPS Communication Foundation with the financial assistance of the Swedish International development Agency (SIDA). International Freedom of Expression eXchange (IFEX) has also contributed to the website's upgrading costs. The contents of this website are the sole responsibility of IPS Communication Foundation and under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the EU and SIDA and IFEX. |