
Last Modified 11-10-2008 00.00
News
The Law on Internet Use is crticized for its restrictive approach towards internet communication. It aims at wider control of publications on the Internet through censorship and written commands say critics who expect it overturned by the President.
Bia news center - İstanbul
16-05-2007
Law No 5651, which is concerned with "the preparation of Internet publications and crimes connected with these publications", was passed by parliament on 4 May 2007. Should the president not veto it, it will be implemented.
The official justification of the law is that it aims at protecting families and children from Internet abuse, namely encouragement of drug use, gambling or suicide, sexual exploitation, etc. It is also claimed that the rapid development of technology has meant that present laws are not comprehensive enough to deal with all possible crimes.
Unsuccessful patching
Up until now there has been no law on crimes relating to Internet publications. However, because the "law" has been conceived in order to deal with threats to family life and children, it does not consider the Internet environment carefully enough. This means that it does not address the issue of publication responsibility and definitions clearly. The law thus resembles unsuccessful patchwork. In the definition of the 14-article law, there is no clarity as to what "crimes" are supposed to be addressed by this law, and which by other laws.
Blocking access
The law stipulates that reasonable suspicion of a crime being committed will lead to blocked access, and it is here that there is a problem. The decision to block access will be made by a judge during the investigation, and by a court during prosecution. In urgent cases, a public prosecutor can also decide to block access for 24 hours, pending approval by a judge. In addition, the Ministry for Telecommunication has been assigned the responsibility for controlling Internet content;in some cases it is also entitled to block access. If it is able to identify the publishers, the Ministry files a complaint with the Republican Prosecutor. Furthermore, the Ministry is entitled to penalise Internet providers who do not block access to a website, initially with a fine, but after non-compliance with closure of the provider.
It is to be expected that critics of the law and proponents of freedom of publication on the Internet will face accusations of not wanting to protect children against prostitution and sexual exploitation. (FI/AA/YE)
|
Home Page |
Documents | About Us |
Links
| Çocuk Sitesi | BİAMag |
Kadının Penceresi | News in English
This website is published within the framework of "Journalism for Rights, Rights for Journalists" -dubbed as BİA3 - project implemented by the IPS Communication Foundation with the financial assistance of the European Union (EU) and Swedish International development Agency (SIDA). International Freedom of Expression eXchange (IFEX) has also contributed to the website's upgrading costs. The contents of this website are the sole responsibility of IPS Communication Foundation and under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the EU and SIDA and IFEX. |